Scroll to:
Additive manufacturing of functionally graded products by selective laser melting: A review
https://doi.org/10.17073/1997-308X-2025-4-77-90
Abstract
This paper presents a review of recent advances in functionally graded additive manufacturing using selective laser melting (SLM, also referred to as laser powder bed fusion, LPBF). The fundamental principles of producing functionally graded products by SLM are discussed, including approaches to forming compositional and structural gradients. Particular attention is given to the formation of the transition layer in the synthesized material, which is crucial for achieving the desired properties of the products. Methods of design and numerical modeling of functionally graded structures are analyzed, including the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning. It is demonstrated that applying bio-inspired design principles enables the development of parts with enhanced mechanical, thermal, and functional properties. Examples are provided of successful fabrication of multi-material products with tailored property anisotropy, as well as products with controlled porosity gradients. The promising application areas of functionally graded products are identified, including aerospace, medicine, mechanical engineering, and energy.
Keywords
For citations:
Borisov E.V., Repnin A.V., Popovich A.A. Additive manufacturing of functionally graded products by selective laser melting: A review. Powder Metallurgy аnd Functional Coatings (Izvestiya Vuzov. Poroshkovaya Metallurgiya i Funktsional'nye Pokrytiya). 2025;19(4):77-90. https://doi.org/10.17073/1997-308X-2025-4-77-90
Introduction
Functionally graded materials (FGMs) are an advanced class of materials distinguished by a continuous variation of composition, structure, and properties along one or more directions [1]. The concept was first introduced in Japan in the 1980s for aerospace applications, as a means of producing heat-resistant materials capable of withstanding steep thermal gradients and high mechanical loads [2]. Unlike conventional composites, where sharp interfaces separate the constituent phases, FGMs exhibit smooth transitions in properties. This reduces stress concentrations at the interfaces and improves the overall reliability of parts [3]. In recent years, additive manufacturing – particularly selective laser melting (SLM, also referred to as laser powder bed fusion, LPBF) – has become one of the most effective approaches for fabricating FGMs [4]. The ability to precisely control process parameters and material composition at the microscale makes it possible to design functionally graded products with tailored distributions of density, porosity, hardness, thermal and electrical conductivity, corrosion resistance, biocompatibility, and other properties [5]. Such control enables practical solutions to engineering challenges, including reducing structural weight without sacrificing strength, enhancing thermal cycling resistance, improving damping capacity, and producing biomedical implants with porosity gradients to promote osseointegration [6].
The potential of FGMs is further expanded through bio-inspired design principles. Bio-inspired materials emulate strategies refined by nature over millions of years of evolution [7–11]. Natural systems achieve exceptional performance and multifunctionality by combining heterogeneous structures in complex hierarchical architectures. While biological materials are limited to naturally available constituents, modern researchers can draw from a vast range of synthetic options [12; 13]. Organisms organize materials from the nano- to the macroscale, displaying distinct mechanical, electrical, optical, and surface properties, as well as adaptive shape-changing capabilities. Notable examples include fish scales with excellent protective functions, spider silk and nacre with outstanding strength, and plants or animals capable of shape transformation for survival [14–17]. Inspired by these natural designs, engineers are developing commercial parts across mechanical engineering, robotics, aerospace, and architecture. The degree to which biomimetic concepts can be realized, however, depends directly on the precision of available fabrication technologies [18–23].
Research on the design and production of functionally graded products is now being actively pursued worldwide. The Fraunhofer Institute in Germany has accumulated extensive expertise in fabricating such structures from metals, ceramics, and polymers. Similar research is carried out at the University of Minho (Braga, Portugal), Washington State University, Harbin Engineering University, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Delft University of Technology, Singapore University of Technology and Design, and Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, among others.
This review summarizes current progress in functionally graded additive manufacturing using SLM. It highlights the fundamental principles of gradient formation in structure and composition, the role of transition layers in synthesized materials, advances in design and modeling methods, and emerging directions for application.
Functionally graded materials
with variable microstructure
The key SLM process parameters that determine the microstructure and properties of fabricated parts include laser power, scanning speed, hatch distance, and layer thickness. Their combined effect defines the volumetric energy density delivered to the material, which in turn governs the melting mode, cooling rate, microstructural evolution, and defect formation. Depending on the selected scanning strategy and parameter set, the resulting structure may consist of oriented grains with a preferred crystallographic orientation, more uniformly distributed equiaxed grains, or a combination of both [24]. A functionally graded component incorporating regions of fine-grained and highly oriented coarse-grained microstructures demonstrates the feasibility of producing materials with user-defined functional characteristics in different zones of a single part. At the same time, the anisotropy of mechanical properties is strongly influenced by the prevailing texture [25].
In the case of Inconel 718 fabricated by SLM, heat treatment preserves the as-built grain texture and morphology without signs of recrystallization. However, it promotes the formation of acicular δ-Ni3Nb precipitates and untransformed Laves phases, which reduce ductility while improving yield strength by creating barriers to dislocation motion [26]. Even after hot isostatic pressing (HIP), a sharp microstructural boundary between fine- and coarse-grained regions is retained, along with a dominant (100) texture in the coarse columnar grain zones. Mechanical properties are markedly improved due to the dissolution of undesirable Laves and δ phases and the elimination of pores, strengthening the grain-size dependence of yield strength in accordance with the Hall–Petch relationship. The combined “HIP + heat treatment” approach provides superior mechanical performance compared with both cast and wrought Inconel 718 [28].
The developed technology for creating graded structures in nickel alloys also enables control over the propagation of fatigue cracks as they pass through the interfacial zone between different microstructures, thereby slowing crack growth and delaying failure [26]. It has been shown that when a fatigue crack propagates across such an interfacial zone, its trajectory changes, which results in a reduced growth rate (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1. rack path deviation as a function of microstructural parameters [26], |
Functionally graded materials
with variable composition
Recent advances have enabled the fabrication of multi-material products with enhanced mechanical properties in a single production cycle by SLM [29]. However, this requires significant modifications to the printer design and the development of technologies for feeding and distributing two or more powder materials, as well as their subsequent separation [30]. In addition, the selected materials must be metallurgically compatible and capable of forming reliable, defect-free bonding [31]. Studies of the “heat-resistant bronze – heat-resistant nickel alloy VZh159 – BrKhZrTV” system produced by SLM have shown that a substantial increase in energy input markedly reduces porosity in the interfacial zones of multi-material samples (Fig. 2, a). Elemental distribution within the interfacial zone is characterized by Ni–Cu interdiffusion across the interface (Fig. 2, b), while microhardness gradually changes from alloy VZh159 to BrKhZrTV over a distance of about 300 μm (Fig. 2, c) [32–34].
Fig. 2. Results of the investigation of the multi-material system VZh159/BrKhZrTV [32–34] |
Complete mixing of the alloys, in which both materials are detected in the X-ray patterns, continues up to the 6th layer of BrKhZrTV. At the 7th layer, a transition to pure BrKhZrTV is observed, which confirms an interfacial zone width of about 300 μm at a layer thickness of 50 μm (Fig. 2, d). Mechanical testing showed that the multi-material sample exhibits a tensile strength more than twice that of BrKhZrTV, although it does not reach the level of VZh159. To eliminate the lack-of-fusion defect during composition changes within a single layer, an overlap zone of approximately 350–400 μm must be ensured. Fig. 3 shows a prototype of a component that can be fabricated based on the VZh159/BrKhZrTV multi-material system.
Fig. 3. Multi-material prototypes with lattice elements and tailored properties |
The study of a multi-material AlSi10Mg/Al–Si–Mg–Cu sample fabricated by SLM revealed that the AlSi10Mg region contained only Al and Si without additional phases, whereas the Al–Si–Mg–Cu region also exhibited a small amount of the Al2Cu phase, as confirmed by chemical composition analysis [35]. Microhardness measurements after heat treatment showed that the Al–Si–Mg–Cu zone had a hardness about 30 % higher than that of the AlSi10Mg zone.
Investigations of a titanium alloy multi-material system (VT6/VT1-0) produced by SLM demonstrated that in the interfacial zone, the contents of Al and V gradually increased from the VT1-0 side toward VT6 (Fig. 4, a), with the interfacial zone width being approximately 200 μm [36; 37]. The effect of the interfacial zone location on mechanical properties was examined, along with the influence of the multi-material architecture on fracture toughness, particularly the fatigue crack growth rate (Figs. 4, b and c).
Fig. 4. Investigation of the VT6/VT1-0 multi-material system [36; 37] |
The study of a unique 316L/FeNi36 multi-material system with a shape-change effect fabricated by SLM [38] identified three distinct compositional regions: an FeNi36 zone, an interfacial zone, and a 316L zone, with the interfacial zone measuring about 50 μm in width. Hardness values ranged from 163 HV in the FeNi36 region to approximately 200 HV in the interfacial zone and 214 HV in the 316L region. The most effective temperature range for achieving maximum displacement was found to be 25–215 °С.
In the Ti6Al4V/Inconel 718 system of otherwise non-weldable alloys produced by SLM [39; 40], defect-free parts were successfully fabricated by introducing transitional layers of Cu and Cu + Nb. These layers showed no significant defects, although some alloy mixing was observed. Chemical composition analysis of multi-materials with a Cu transitional layer revealed that the interfacial zone between Cu and Ti6Al4V was wider than that between Cu and Inconel 718. When a Cu + Nb transitional layer was used, the Ti6Al4V/Nb and Inconel 718/Cu interfacial zones were relatively narrow, with a smooth compositional gradient between Nb and Cu. Mechanical testing further demonstrated that samples with Cu + Nb transitional layers achieved superior strength (ultimate tensile strength of 910 MPa) compared with those containing Cu alone (790 MPa). Although these values were lower than those of the base alloys, the fracture surfaces exhibited a stepwise morphology, with distinct fracture zones for each alloy reflecting their characteristic fracture mechanisms.
In the 316L/NiTi system incorporating a transitional layer of the high-entropy CoCrFeNiMn alloy [41], localized macrosegregation was observed in the interfacial zone, attributed to the Marangoni effect. Combined phase and chemical analyses, together with hardness measurements, suggested the formation of FeTi intermetallics in these macrosegregated regions, which, according to the authors, could promote crack initiation due to their embrittling influence.
Alternative strategies for producing multi-material products include methods that enable the design of composites with unique property combinations while retaining high functionality in the final product. Powder blending can be used to create systems with transitional layers, although some samples show limitations in dimensional accuracy [42]. For instance, Ti5Al2.5Sn and Ti6Al4V samples demonstrated defect-free interfacial zones suitable for critical applications, unlike the incompatible Ti6Al4V and IN718 alloys, unlike the non-weldable Ti6Al4V and IN718 alloys [43; 44]. The combination of SLM and powder metallurgy has produced nacre-like structures in titanium alloys with improved strain hardening [45], while multi-materials of Inconel 718 and 316L stainless steel achieved a tensile strength of 751.82 MPa with 25.14 % elongation [46]. Such systems have been applied in high-performance heat exchangers (316L/CuZr) for electronics and bio-inspired implants (Ti6Al4V/NiTi) for medical use [47; 48].
SLM processing of SS316L and CuSn10 alloys has been shown to significantly improve their functional performance [49], while the fabrication of bio-inspired structures from 18Ni300, CoCrMo, 316L, and CuSn alloys enables controlled anisotropy depending on the loading direction [50].
Functionally graded materials
with shape memory effect
SLM technology is considered a highly promising method for the industrial production of products from shape memory alloys (SMAs) with tailored functional characteristics. Its value lies in the flexibility to control not only geometric parameters during fabrication but also the functional behavior of the final component through process design. This approach is particularly valuable in high-tech fields that demand the manufacture of miniaturized parts with complex geometries, such as medical stents and implants [51], as well as aerospace actuators [52]. The possibility of achieving the desired structure and functional properties of NiTi (commonly referred to as nitinol) has been demonstrated by adjusting SLM process parameters [53; 54]. An increase in energy density or the use of a double-laser scanning strategy reduces the nickel content in the alloy and increases the phase transformation temperatures [53].
The formation of tailored structural parameters strongly influences the properties of nitinol. For instance, adjusting the hatch spacing makes it possible to control the development of a directional grain structure, dislocation density, the phase transformation temperature range, and the thermo-cyclic stability of NiTi alloys [55]. In the context of 4D printing of metallic materials, the phase transformation temperature range and the microstructure – closely linked to the thermo-mechanical response – are the two key factors that determine SMA performance. It has been shown that larger grain sizes lead to lower phase transformation temperatures [56]. Building on this effect, the creation of crystallographically oriented, directional structures in NiTi enables a substantial expansion of the superelastic region [57] and improves the stability of the shape memory effect by reducing irreversible plastic deformation (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5. Microstructure and strain curves of textured (a, c), and non-textured (b, d) NiTi alloys, |
In a NiTi alloy with reduced nickel content (49.4 at. %) and a <001> texture produced by additive manufacturing, record superelasticity was achieved up to 453 K, with a broad transformation temperature range of 110 K. This behavior is attributed to high deformation resistance and improved phase compatibility between austenite and martensite. The developed approach simultaneously enhances superelasticity and stabilizes the shape memory effect by promoting the formation of textured martensite and suppressing dislocation motion through Ti2NiOx precipitates. Heat treatment primarily affects nanoscale precipitates and atomic defects, while having little influence on grain size or morphology. Direct aging after SLM facilitates the formation of Ti2NiOx within grains, whereas homogenization annealing dissolves metastable titanium in the NiTi matrix and reduces defect density. All heat treatment modes reinforce phase transformations by increasing the Ti/Ni atomic ratio and lowering defect density [58].
Functionally graded metamaterials
Metamaterials are specially engineered materials with a unique internal architecture (geometry) that provides combinations of physical, mechanical, and functional properties distinct from those of the base material from which they are made. For example, auxetic meta-biomaterials with a negative Poisson’s ratio and a low Young’s modulus have been designed and modeled to closely replicate the properties of human trabecular bone [59], where the high stiffness of conventional materials often causes inflammation and implant rejection [60].
In energy absorption applications, metallic dampers with complex geometries frequently undergo permanent deformation due to local yielding. By contrast, nitinol (NiTi) provides recoverable deformation and effective energy dissipation through its unique superelasticity, offering new opportunities for the design and additive manufacturing of energy-absorbing architectural metamaterials [56]. Under uniaxial compression, lattice structures form superelastic hinges at their nodes, while the martensitic transformation gradually propagates from the nodes along the struts.
NiTi parts fabricated by SLM have also been shown to exhibit superelastic behavior under cyclic loading, with relatively low accumulation of irreversible strain (about 1.2 % after 11 cycles) [61], making them particularly suitable for applications requiring repeated shape recovery.
Modeling and design
of functionally graded products
Digital design plays a crucial role in the development of functionally graded products. Because these products possess a heterogeneous internal structure, their design requires specially tailored methodologies. Traditional approaches have therefore been extended: today, not only the geometry of a single-material component is designed, but also its internal architecture, taking into account variable structures or the use of multiple materials. Finite element modeling has shown high accuracy in predicting the mechanical behavior of parts made from the heat-resistant alloy EI961, when combining SLM with direct laser deposition. Comparable results were obtained for the nickel alloy VZh159 in combination with the copper alloy CuCr1Zr. However, the authors [62; 63] highlighted the need for further refinement of models to more accurately account for the characteristics of interfacial zones in functionally graded materials. An innovative approach to predicting deformation and residual stresses in SLM-fabricated turbine blades was proposed in [64], showing how pre-deformed models can compensate for anticipated warping in the final parts. The inelastic behavior of functionally graded products was investigated in [65] by calibrating modeling parameters against experimental samples, which produced good agreement between predicted and measured mechanical properties. In [66], a methodology for modeling the mechanical properties of endoprostheses was developed by varying the topology of lattice structures, identifying optimal configurations for replacing both cortical and trabecular bone tissue (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6. Von Mises stress fields (a), maximum tensile stress fields (b), |
To minimize defects in multi-materials fabricated by SLM and to predict their resulting properties, computer simulations of both manufacturing and service processes are employed [67–70]. This is particularly important for parts made of alloys prone to defect formation, such as NiTi [53]. In both cases, the decisive factor is the interaction between two dissimilar materials. For example, in [71], thermo-mechanical models were used to simulate residual stresses in parts made of Inconel 625. In [72], a cellular automata model was developed to predict microstructure evolution during SLM of materials exposed to large temperature gradients and high cooling rates.
Artificial intelligence technologies
in additive manufacturing
Modern software solutions based on artificial intelligence (AI) are increasingly being applied to the digital design of multi-materials produced by additive manufacturing [73]. Traditional design tools can no longer handle tasks of this complexity, whereas new approaches enable the full potential of multi-material products to be realized. For example, the company Leap 71 (United Arab Emirates) develops parts for SLM production using its proprietary AI-based software PicoGK (Fig. 7) [74].
Fig. 7. Examples of parts designed using the PicoGK software developed by Leap 71 [74] |
Methods for designing smart multi-materials have also been proposed [75; 76]. In one study, an evolutionary algorithm was used for design [77]. This non-deterministic method relies on bio-inspired principles of natural selection and evolution, creating “more advanced individuals” across successive generations to represent candidate solutions. Alongside natural selection based on fitness – often referred to as “survival of the fittest” – concepts such as mutation, recombination, and populations containing “parents” and “children” are adapted to each design task. Using this digital design system, researchers demonstrated the feasibility of producing an active composite in the form of a simple cantilever beam with a multi-material structure that changed shape under thermal loading.
Machine learning methods can also be used to optimize processing parameters in the fabrication of multi-material products by SLM [78]. An algorithm based on a multidimensional Gaussian process was developed to predict part density and surface roughness as functions of parameters such as laser power, scan speed, and hatch spacing. Training data were collected using a high-throughput experimental approach. The resulting process maps provide clear visualization of the relationships between process parameters and the properties of interfacial zones in multi-material parts. Notably, process parameters exhibit a nonlinear dependence on composition, meaning that settings suitable for alloy 1 or alloy 2 cannot be directly applied to the interfacial zones.
To further improve the quality of multi-materials produced by SLM, real-time process monitoring can be implemented, with printing parameters adjusted based on data analysis [79; 80]. Advanced techniques such as high-speed and infrared imaging allow the collection of critical information on melt bath size and characteristics, while machine learning provides powerful tools for analyzing these data. In one study, acoustic and optical emission signals associated with the laser wavelength were monitored during the fabrication of multi-material copper parts [81]. A specialized signal monitoring and classification system based on contrastive deep learning was applied. The results revealed clear differences in energy levels for powders of different compositions, indicating variations in melt dynamics. The study also confirmed the effectiveness of combining contrastive learning with multi-sensor monitoring strategies for SLM processes in multi-material production.
Conclusion
Functionally graded products produced by SLM represent a promising direction in modern materials science. Multi-material systems with compositional gradients show substantial improvements in mechanical performance compared with single-material counterparts. Interfacial zones between different alloys play a crucial role in ensuring reliable bonding, while optimizing energy density significantly reduces porosity in these regions. The development of metamaterials with specially designed internal architectures imparts unique physical and mechanical properties, essential for applications such as biomechanically compatible implants and efficient energy-absorbing structures.
Functionally graded products with a shape memory effect, particularly NiTi alloys fabricated by SLM, exhibit enhanced functional performance. The formation of directional grain structures and textures extends the superelastic region and improves the stability of the shape memory effect. Advances in digital design and modeling now enable accurate prediction of properties and optimization of processing parameters, while the integration of artificial intelligence technologies opens new possibilities for design, real-time process monitoring, and process optimization.
Overall, functionally graded products produced by SLM hold great potential for aerospace, medicine, robotics, and other high-tech fields where unique combinations of properties are required.
References
1. Miyamoto Y., Kaysser W.A., Rabin B.H., Kawasaki A., Ford R.G. Functionally graded materials: Design, processing and applications. Springer Science & Business Media. 2013;5:1–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5301-4
2. Koizumi M. FGM activities in Japan. Composites Part B: Engineering. 1997;28(1-2):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-8368(96)00016-9
3. Mahamood R.M., Akinlabi E.T. Functionally graded materials. Cham: Springer. 2017;103:1–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53756-6
4. Yang J., Gu D., Lin K., Zhang Y., Guo M., Yuan L., Zhang H., Zhang H. Laser additive manufacturing of bio-inspired metallic structures. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering: Additive Manufacturing Frontiers. 2022;1(1):100013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmeaf.2022.100013
5. Reichardt A., Shapiro A.A., Otis R., Dillon R.P., Borgonia J.P., McEnerney B.W., Hosemann P., Beese A.M. Advances in additive manufacturing of metal-based functionally graded materials. International Materials Reviews. 2021;66(1):1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2020.1747913
6. Wang X., Xu S., Zhou S., Xu W., Leary M., Choong P., Qian M., Brandt M., Xie Y.M. Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: A review. Biomaterials. 2016;83:127–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.012
7. Kovalchuk M.V. The first Russian crystallographic congress. From convergence of sciences to nature-like technologies. Crystallographiya. 2018;(2):173–175. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.7868/S0023476118020017
8. Yaraghi N.A., Kisailus D. Biomimetic structural materials: Inspiration from design and assembly. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry. 2018;69:23–57. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-040215-112621
9. Su F.Y., Bushong E.A., Deerinck T.J., Seo K., Herrera S., Graeve O.A., Kisailus D., Lubarda A.V., McKittrick J. Spines of the porcupine fish: Structure, composition, and mechanical properties. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2017;73:38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.08.020
10. Sullivan T.N., Pissarenko A., Herrera S.A., Kisailus D., Lubarda V.A., Meyers M.A. A lightweight, biological structure with tailored stiffness: The feather vane. Acta Biomaterialia. 2016;41:27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.05.022
11. Salinas C.L., de Obaldia E.E., Jeong C., Hernández J.J., Zavattieri P., Kisailus D. Enhanced toughening of the crossed lamellar structure revealed by nanoindentation. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2017;76:58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.05.036
12. Wegst U.G.K., Bai H., Saiz E., Tomsia A.P., Ritchie R.O. Bioinspired structural materials. Nature Materials. 2014; 14(1):23–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4089
13. Rawat P., Zhu D., Rahman M. Z., Barthelat F. Structural and mechanical properties of fish scales for the bio-inspired design of flexible body armors: A review. Acta Biomaterialia. 2021;121:41–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.11.040
14. Yin S., Guo W., Wang H., Huang Y., Yang R., Hu Z., Chen D., Xu J., Ritchie R.O. Strong and tough bioinspired additive-manufactured dual-phase mechanical metamaterial composites. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 2021;149:104321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2021.104321
15. Tee Y.L., Tran P. On bioinspired 4D printing: materials, design and potential applications. Journal of the Institution of Engineers, Australia. 2021;19(5):642–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/14484846.2021.1988434
16. Yang Y., Song X., Li X., Chen Z., Zhou C., Zhou Q., Chen Y. Recent progress in biomimetic additive manufacturing technology: From materials to functional structures. Advanced Materials. 2018;30(36):1706539. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201706539
17. Li W., Pei Y., Zhang C., Kottapalli A.G.P. Bioinspired designs and biomimetic applications of triboelectric nanogenerators. Nano Energy. 2021;84:105865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105865
18. Brulé V., Rafsanjani A., Asgari M., Western T.L., Pasini D. Three-dimensional functional gradients direct stem curling in the resurrection plant Selaginella lepidophylla. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 2019;16(159):20190454. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2019.0454
19. Du Plessis A., Broeckhoven C., Yadroitsava I., Yadroitsev I. Beautiful and functional: A review of biomimetic design in additive manufacturing. Additive Manufacturing. 2019;27:408–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.033
20. Pathak S. Biomimicry: (Innovation Inspired by Nature). International Journal of New Technology and Research. 2019;5(6):1–8. https://doi.org/10.31871/IJNTR.5.6.17
21. Nazari K., Tran P., Tan P., Ghazlan A., Ngo T.D., Xie Y.M. Advanced manufacturing methods for ceramic and bioinspired ceramic composites: A review. Open Ceramics. 2023;15:100399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceram.2023.100399
22. Zhang B., Han Q., Zhang J., Han Z., Niu S., Ren L. Advanced bio-inspired structural materials: Local properties determine overall performance. Materials Today. 2020;41:177–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2020.09.016
23. Ahamed M.K., Wang H., Hazell P.J. From biology to biomimicry: Using nature to build better structures. A review. Construction and Building Materials. 2022;320:126252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126252
24. Popovich V.A., Borisov E.V., Popovich A.A., Sufiiarov V.S., Masaylo D.V., Alzina L. Functionally graded Inconel 718 processed by additive manufacturing: Crystallographic texture, anisotropy of microstructure and mechanical properties. Materials & Design. 2017;114:441–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.075
25. Popovich A.A., Sufiiarov V.S., Borisov E.V., Polozov I.A., Masaylo D.V., Grigoriev A.V. Anisotropy of mechanical properties of products manufactured using selective laser melting of powdered materials. Russian Journal of Non-Ferrous Metals. 2017;58:389–395. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1067821217040149
26. Popovich V.A., Borisov E.V., Popovich A.A., Sufiiarov V.S., Masaylo D.V., Alzina L. Impact of heat treatment on mechanical behaviour of Inconel 718 processed with tailored microstructure by selective laser melting. Materials & Design. 2017;131:12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.065
27. Ghorbanpour S., Sahu S., Deshmukh K., Borisov E., Riemslag T., Reinton E., Bertolo V., Jiang Q., Popovich A., Shamshurin A., Knezevic M., Popovich V. Effect of microstructure induced anisotropy on fatigue behaviour of functionally graded Inconel 718 fabricated by additive manufacturing. Materials Characterization. 2021;179:111350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2021.111350
28. Ghorbanpour S., Deshmukh K., Sahu S., Riemslag T., Reinton E., Borisov E., Popovich A., Bertolo V., Jiang Q., Sanchez M.T., Knezevic M., Popovich V. Additive manufacturing of functionally graded Inconel 718: Effect of heat treatment and building orientation on microstructure and fatigue behaviour. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2022;306:117573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117573
29. Bandyopadhyay A., Heer B. Additive manufacturing of multi-material structures. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports. 2018;129:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2018.04.001
30. Hasanov S., Alkunte S., Rajeshirke M., Gupta A., Huseynov O., Fidan I., Alifui-Segbaya F., Rennie A. Review on additive manufacturing of multi-material parts: Progress and challenges. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing. 2021;6(1):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp6010004
31. Wang D., Liu L., Deng G., Deng C., Bai Y., Yang Y., Wu W., Chen J., Liu Y., Wang Y., Lin X., Han C. Recent progress on additive manufacturing of multi-material structures with laser powder bed fusion. Virtual and Physical Prototyping. 2022;17(2):329–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2022.2051531
32. Repnin A.V., Borisov E.V., Popovich A.A., Shamshurin A.I. Creating multi-material samples of the system EI1319–BrCrCrTi by selective laser melting. Global Energy. 2023;29(2):175–188. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18721/JEST.29212
33. Repnin A.V., Borisov E.V., Popovich A.A., Golubkov N.A. Mechanical properties of the VZh159–CuCr1Zr alloy multi-material samples manufactured by selective laser melting. Powder Metallurgy аnd Functional Coatings. 2024;18(1):52–61. https://doi.org/10.17073/1997-308X-2024-1-52-61
34. Repnin A.V., Borisov E.V., Popovich A.A., Investigation of multi-material samples with three-dimensional composition change obtained by selective laser melting method. Global Energy. 2024;30(4):37–52. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18721/JEST.30403
35. Borisov E., Repnin A., Popovich A. Investigation of AlSi10Mg alloy composition modification by Cu addition in selective laser melting. In: The International Conference “Advanced Mechanics: Structure, Materials, Tribology” (Samarkand, 23–26 September 2024). AIP Conference Proceedings, 2025; 3562 (1):010001.
36. Borisov E., Polozov I., Starikov K., Popovich A., Sufiiarov V. Structure and properties of Ti/Ti64 graded material manufactured by laser powder bed fusion. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(20):6035. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14206035
37. Repnin A., Borisov E., Popovich A., Shamshurin A. Fracture toughness of Ti6Al4V/Cp-Ti multi-material produced via selective laser melting. Metals. 2023;13(10):1738. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13101738
38. Repnin A., Borisov E., Maksimov A., Rozhkova D., Popovich A. Investigation of the 4D multi-material 316L/FeNi36 obtained by selective laser melting. Micromachines. 2024;15(11):1288. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15111288
39. Repnin A., Borisov E., Popovich A. Investigation of Inconel 718/Ti6Al4V Multi-material obtained by selective laser melting with transition layer. In: The International Conference “Advanced Mechanics: Structure, Materials, Tribology” (Samarkand, 23–26 September 2024). AIP Conference Proceedings, 2025; 3562 (1):050005.
40. Repnin A., Borisov E., Popovich A. Formation of the Cu + Nb interlayer in the inconel 718/Ti6Al4V multi-material obtained by selective laser melting. Materials. 2024;17(23):5801. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17235801
41. Repnin A., Kim A., Popovich A. Interfacial characterization of selective laser melting of a SS316L/NiTi multi-material with a high-entropy alloy interlayer. Crystals. 2023;13(10):1486. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13101486
42. Demir A.G., Previtali B. Multi-material selective laser melting of Fe/Al–12Si components. Manufacturing Letters. 2017;11:8–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2017.01.002
43. Wei K., Zeng X., Li F., Liu M., Deng J. Microstructure and mechanical property of Ti–5Al–2.5Sn/Ti–6Al–4V dissimilar titanium alloys integrally fabricated by selective laser melting. Journal of Metals. 2020;72(3):1031–1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-020-04045-3
44. Scaramuccia M.G., Demir A.G., Caprio L., Tassa O., Previtali B. Development of processing strategies for multigraded selective laser melting of Ti6Al4V and IN718. Powder Technology. 2020;367:376–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.04.010
45. Liu X., Liu Z., Liu Y., Zafar Z., Lu Y., Wu X., Jiang Y., Xu Z., Guo Z., Li S. Achieving high strength and toughness by engineering 3D artificial nacre-like structures in Ti6Al4V-Ti metallic composite. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2022;230:109552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109552
46. Peng Y., Shi Y., Jin T., Ren J., Bian Y. Structural design, interfacial behavior and mechanical properties of bimetallic nacre-like structures by laser powder-bed fusion. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2024;990:174470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.174470
47. Chueh Y.H., Hsieh B.Y., Shih A.J. Interfacial characteristics in multi-material laser powder bed fusion of CuZr/316L stainless steel. CIRP Annals. 2024;73(1):145–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2024.03.012
48. Costa M.M., Lima R., Alves N., Silva N.A., Gasik M., Silva F.S., Bartolomeu F., Miranda G. Multi-material cellular structured orthopedic implants design: In vitro and bio-tribological performance. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2022;131:105246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105246
49. Chen K., Wang C., Hong Q., Wen S., Zhou Y., Yan C., Shi Y. Selective laser melting 316L/CuSn10 multi-materials: Processing optimization, interfacial characterization and mechanical property. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2020;283:116711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116711
50. Zhang M., Yang Y., Xu M., Chen J., Wang D. Mechanical properties of multi-materials porous structures based on triply periodic minimal surface fabricated by additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2021;27(9): 1681–1692. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-07-2020-0153
51. Gracheva A., Polozov I., Popovich A. Additive manufacturing of biodegradable metallic implants by selective laser melting: Current research status and application perspectives. Metals. 2025;15(7):754. https://doi.org/10.3390/MET15070754
52. Tsaturyants M., Sheremetyev V., Dubinskiy S., Komarov V., Polyakova K., Korotitskiy A., Prokoshkin S., Borisov E., Starikov K., Kaledina D., Popovich A., Brailovski V. Structure and properties of Ti–50.2Ni alloy processed by laser powder bed fusion and subjected to a combination of thermal cycling and heat treatments. Shape Memory and Superelasticity. 2022;8(1):16–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40830-022-00362-5
53. Zhu J.N., Borisov E., Liang, X., Farber E., Hermans M.J.M., Popovich V.A. Predictive analytical modelling and experimental validation of processing maps in additive manufacturing of nitinol alloys. Additive Manufacturing. 2021;38:101802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101802
54. Borisov E., Starikov K., Popovich A., Tihonovskaya T. Investigation of the possibility of tailoring the chemical composition of the NiTi alloy by selective laser melting. Metals. 2021;11(9):1470. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11091470
55. Zhu J. N., Borisov E., Liang X., Huizenga R., Popovich A., Bliznuk V., Petrov R., Hermans M., Popovich V. Controlling microstructure evolution and phase transformation behavior in additive manufacturing of nitinol shape memory alloys by tuning hatch distance. Journal of Materials Science. 2022;57(10):6066–6084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-07043-9
56. Yan Z., Zhu J.N., Borisov E., Riemslag T., Scott S.P., Hermans M., Jovanova J., Popovich V. Superelastic response and damping behavior of additively manufactured Nitinol architectured materials. Additive Manufacturing. 2023;68:103505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2023.103505
57. Zhu J.N., Liu K., Riemslag T., Tichelaar F.D., Borisov E., Yao X., Popovich A., Huizenga R., Hermans M., Popovich V. Achieving superelasticity in additively manufactured Ni-lean NiTi by crystallographic design. Materials & Design. 2023;230:111949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111949
58. Zhu J.N., Zhu W., Borisov E., Yao X., Riemslag T., Goulas C., Popovich A., Yan Z., Tichelaar F.D., Mainali D.P., Hermans M., Popovich V. Effect of heat treatment on microstructure and functional properties of additively manufactured NiTi shape memory alloys. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2023;967:171740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171740
59. Farber E., Orlov A., Popovich A. Auxetic meta-biomaterials: Computer simulation and experimental results. Metals. 2025;15(3):241. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15030241
60. Farber E., Orlov A., Popovich A. Effect of lattice structures topology on the properties of the TiNi alloy: Computer simulation. Prospects. 2021;1:3.
61. Farber E., Orlov A., Borisov E., Repnin A., Kuzin S., Golubkov N., Popovich A. TiNi alloy lattice structures with negative Poisson’s ratio: computer simulation and experimental results. Metals. 2022;12(9):1476. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12091476
62. Orlov A., Repnin A., Farber E., Borisov E., Popovich A. Fabrication of multi-material samples from nickel and copper alloys by selective laser melting: Computer simulation and experimental results. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2024;3154(1):020028. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0201286
63. Orlov A., Masaylo D., Igoshin S., Razumov N., Popovich A. Mechanical properties prediction of the materials gained by combining additive technologies. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2020;30:752–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.563
64. Orlov A., Borisov E., Popovich A.A. Numerical simulation of the selective laser melting process using the example of a turbine blade. Materials Science Forum. 2020;989:850–855. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.989.850
65. Orlov A.V., Sufiiarov V.S., Borisov E.V., Polozov I.A., Masaylo D.V., Popovich A.A., Chukovenkova M.O., Soklakov A.V., Mikhaluk, D.S. Numerical simulation of the inelastic behavior of a structurally graded material. Letters on Materials. 2019;9(1):97–102. https://doi.org/10.22226/2410-3535-2019-1-97-102
66. Sufiiarov V.S., Orlov A.V., Borisov E.V., Sokolova V.V., Chukovenkova M.O., Soklakov A.V., Mikhaluk A.A., Popovich A.A. Modeling the mechanical properties of lattice structures made by selective laser melting. Letters on Materials. 2020;10(2):123–128. https://doi.org/10.22226/2410-3535-2020-2-123-128
67. Sufiiarov V.S., Orlov A.V., Borisov E.V., Sokolova V.V., Chukovenkova M.O., Soklakov A.V., Mikhaluk D.S., Popovich A.A. Design and mechanical properties simulation of graded lattice structures for additive manufacturing endoprostheses. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures. 2021;28(16):1656–1662. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2019.1680701
68. Sorkin A., Tan J.L., Wong C.H. Multi-material modelling for selective laser melting. Procedia Engineering. 2017;216:51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.02.084
69. Küng V.E., Scherr R., Markl M., Körner C. Multi-material model for the simulation of powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Computational Materials Science. 2021;194:110415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110415
70. Tang C., Yao L., Du H. Computational framework for the simulation of multi material laser powder bed fusion. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2022;191:122855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.122855
71. Wang Z., Denlinger E., Michaleris P., Stoica A.D., Ma D., Beese A.M. Residual stress mapping in Inconel 625 fabricated through additive manufacturing: Method for neutron diffraction measurements to validate thermomechanical model predictions. Materials & Design. 2017;113:169–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.003
72. Ao X., Xia H., Liu J., He Q. Simulations of microstructure coupling with moving molten pool by selective laser melting using a cellular automaton. Materials & Design. 2020;185:108230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108230
73. Miao H., Yusof F., Karim M.S.A., Badruddin I.A., Hussien M., Kamangar S., Zhang H. Process parameter optimisation for selective laser melting of AlSi10Mg-316L multi-materials using machine learning method. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2023;129(7): 3093-3108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12489-5
74. Gallery LEAP 71. URL: https://leap71.com/gallery/ (Accessed: 01.10.2020).
75. Athinarayanarao D., Prod’hon R., Chamoret D., Qi H.J., Bodaghi M., André J.C., Demoly F. Computational design for 4D printing of topology optimized multi-material active composites. Computational Materials. 2023;9(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-023-00997-7
76. Benyahia K., Seriket H., Prod’hon R., Gomes S., Andr J.C., Qi H.J., Demoly F.A computational design approach for multi-material 4D printing based on interlocking blocks assembly. Additive Manufacturing. 2022;58:102993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.102993
77. Salonitis K., Chantzis D., Kappatos V. A hybrid finite element analysis and evolutionary computation method for the design of lightweight lattice components with optimized strut diameter. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2017;90(9–12):2689–2701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9528-x
78. Rankouhi B., Jahani S., Pfefferkorn F. E., Thoma D.J. Compositional grading of a 316L-Cu multi-material part using machine learning for the determination of selective laser melting process parameters. Additive Manufacturing. 2021; 38:101836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101836
79. Zhu Z., Ng D.W.H., Park H.S., McAlpine M.C. 3D-printed multifunctional materials enabled by artificial-intelligence-assisted fabrication technologies. Nature Reviews Materials. 2020;6(1):27–47. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-020-00235-2
80. Ibrahim Z.E., Linda I., Omer M., Kamran K., Andreas S.. Recent advancements in hybrid additive manufacturing of similar and dissimilar metals via laser powder bed fusion. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2024:146833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2024.146833
81. Pandiyan V., Baganis A., Axel Richter R., Wróbel R., Leinenbach C. Qualify-as-you-go: sensor fusion of optical and acoustic signatures with contrastive deep learning for multi-material composition monitoring in laser powder bed fusion process. Virtual and Physical Prototyping. 2024;19(1):e2356080. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2024.2356080
About the Authors
E. V. BorisovRussian Federation
Evgenii V. Borisov – Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Leading Researcher of Laboratory “Synthesis of New Materials and Structures”
29 Politekhnicheskaya Str., St. Petersburg 195251, Russia
A. V. Repnin
Russian Federation
Arseniy V. Repnin – Engineer of Laboratory “Synthesis of New Materials and Structures”
29 Politekhnicheskaya Str., St. Petersburg 195251, Russia
A. A. Popovich
Russian Federation
Anatoliy A. Popovich – Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor, Director of the Institute of Machinery, Materials, and Transport
29 Politekhnicheskaya Str., St. Petersburg 195251, Russia
Review
For citations:
Borisov E.V., Repnin A.V., Popovich A.A. Additive manufacturing of functionally graded products by selective laser melting: A review. Powder Metallurgy аnd Functional Coatings (Izvestiya Vuzov. Poroshkovaya Metallurgiya i Funktsional'nye Pokrytiya). 2025;19(4):77-90. https://doi.org/10.17073/1997-308X-2025-4-77-90