Contents
Scroll to:
Synthesis of high-entropy (Y0.2Yb0.2Lu0.2Eu0.2Er0.2)3Al5O12 ceramics using a fast electron beam
https://doi.org/10.17073/1997-308X-2026-2-40-47
Abstract
High-entropy ceramics intended for thermal barrier coatings are developed to improve their performance properties, particularly by increasing their operating temperature. However, conventional synthesis of high-entropy ceramics is time-consuming. This study explores a nonconventional approach to reducing synthesis time by processing ceramic materials with a high-power beam of high-energy electrons (fast electrons). A powder mixture of the initial reactants Y2O3 , Yb2O3 , Lu2O3 , Eu2O3 , Er2O3 , and Al2O3 was heated in air using 1.4 MeV electrons at different electron-beam currents. The cuvette containing the powder mixture was moved beneath the beam at 1 cm/s, while the beam was scanned across the width of the internal volume of the cuvette. The total irradiation time was 10 s. At beam currents of 4 mA or higher, melt droplets formed within the irradiated powder mass, and their proportion relative to the unmelted powder increased with increasing current. Crystallization occured in the melt droplets during cooling. The resulted droplet-shaped ceramic product was highly porous because of the intense release of adsorbed gases from the melt. SEM images and EDS elemental maps relealed a uniform distribution of the constituent elements throughout the droplet-shaped ceramic product. XRD analysis identified the synthesized material as high-entropy (Y0.2Yb0.2Lu0.2Eu0.2Er0.2 )3Al5O12 ceramic. The powder that did not contribute to the formation of the droplet-shaped product was an intermediate product containing Er3Al5O12 and Y3Al5O12 garnets, together with Er2O3 , Yb2O3 , Y2O3 , Eu2O3 , Lu2O3 , Al2O3 oxides.
Supporting agencies: The work was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Science Foundation (grant No. 23-79-00014).
For citations:
Ghyngazov S.A., Vasil’ev I.P., Boltueva V.A., Krivobokov V.P. Synthesis of high-entropy (Y0.2Yb0.2Lu0.2Eu0.2Er0.2)3Al5O12 ceramics using a fast electron beam. Powder Metallurgy аnd Functional Coatings (Izvestiya Vuzov. Poroshkovaya Metallurgiya i Funktsional'nye Pokrytiya). 2026;20(2):40-47. https://doi.org/10.17073/1997-308X-2026-2-40-47
Introduction
Ceramics, owing to their unique properties, are frequently employed as alternatives to metals and alloys [1]. Where requisite mechanical strength cannot be achieved without metals, ceramics serve as protective coatings, providing enhanced heat resistance for the component as a whole [2; 3]. Such thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) are particularly vital in the aviation industry [4]. A TBC system typically comprises multiple layers [5], where the ceramic topcoat ensures thermal protection for components such as gas turbine blades [6; 7]. Traditionally, zirconium dioxide serves this purpose [8; 9]. Since this ceramic exhibit intrinsic polymorphism [10; 11], yttrium oxide is added to stabilize its crystal structure [12]. However, these measures remain inadequate for operation at elevated temperatures.
High-entropy ceramics (HECs) have recently been considered by researchers as an alternative to partially or fully stabilized zirconia [13–16]. HECs are solid solutions of inorganic compounds characterized by one or more Wyckoff sites occupied by several principal elements (five or more) in near-equiatomic ratios [13].
The development of HECs was stimulated by advances in high-entropy alloys [17; 18], gradually extending the concept to various ceramic applications [19]. Successful fabrication of HECs for TBCs has been reported [20–22]. Nevertheless, the synthesis route remains a bottleneck. Solid-state synthesis is the most widespread method [23–25], yet it is costly and energy-intensive due to prolonged high-energy mechanical activation and extended holding times at high temperatures for compacted powders [26]. To improve results, these operations are often repeated on the material obtained after the initial cycle [26].
Reducing HEC synthesis time is a pressing challenge in modern materials science. One proposed solution is spark plasma sintering (SPS) [27; 28]. Nonetheless, SPS does not consistently yield single-phase HECs and may introduce extraneous contaminants that compromise the quality of the final product [29]. Recently, irradiation with intense high-energy electron beams (fast electrons) has been proposed for the synthesis of complex oxides [30]. Within a few seconds under atmospheric conditions, while maintaining almost the original bulk density of the powder mixture, various oxide ceramic materials, including phosphors [31; 32], titanates [33] and zirconolite [34], can be successfully synthesized by fast electron beam processing [35].
This study aims to synthesize high-entropy garnet-type ceramics (Y0.2Yb0.2Lu0.2Eu0.2Er0.2)3Al5O12 using a high-power fast electron beam.
Materials and experimental methods
Stoichiometric amounts of high-purity (99.9%) binary oxides – Y2O3 , Yb2O3 , Lu2O3 , Eu2O3 , Er2O3 , Al2O3 were dry-milled in a planetary ball mill for 30 min. The as-received oxide powders exhibited a mean particle size not exceeding 5 μm. The blended powder was subsequently loaded into a bulk copper crucible and subjected to rapid electron-beam irradiation in ambient air. The synthesis was performed on the unique scientific facility “Stand ELV-6” (Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS, Novosibirsk). A schematic diagram and photograph of the experimental setup are provided in Ref. [33].
The required amount of starting material was determined by calculation based on the condition of complete absorption of a 1.4 MeV electron beam within the powder layer [33], resulting in a loading density of 0.59 g/cm2. Irradiation was performed in ambient air. To ensure uniform exposure, the copper crucible was translated horizontally relative to the beam axis, either with or without raster scanning across the cavity width. Detailed descriptions of the irradiation methodology are available in Refs. [34–36]. Phase composition and morphology were analyzed post-synthesis. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was conducted using a Hitachi TM-3000 instrument. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on an ARL X’TRA diffractometer (Switzerland). The Vickers microhardness of the solidified ceramic specimens was evaluated using a Zwick hardness testing machine (Ger.
Experimental results
Photographs of the samples before and after irradiation are shown in Fig. 1. A 1.4 MeV electron beam with a cross-sectional area of approximately 1 cm2 on the powder surface was used for synthesis. The copper crucible was translated beneath the beam at a constant speed of V = 1 cm/s. By adjusting the electron beam current, the incident power density was varied within the range of 2.8 to 16.8 kW/cm2.
Fig. 1. Photographs of the cuvette containing the powder mixture before (Ie = 0 мА) |
At electron beam currents of Ie ≥ 4 mA, partial melting of the oxide mixture occurs, leading to the formation of spherical ceramic beads upon cooling. The mean diameter of these beads exhibits a positive correlation with the beam current. Concurrently, the fraction of unreacted feedstock powder decreases as Ie rises. Initial droplet formation is observed at the threshold current of Ie = 4 mA. At Ie = 12 mA, complete melting is achieved, with over 90 wt. % of the initial batch transitioning into the liquid phase. This qualitative observation is corroborated by gravimetric analysis, which compares the mass of the loaded powder before irradiation to the residual unmelted residue collected after treatment.
Prior investigations demonstrated that irradiation optimization yields high process efficiencies exceeding 90 % [37], a finding fully supported by thermodynamic modeling [38]. The solidified droplets possess a distinctly porous structure, as revealed by the cross-sectional view in Fig. 2. The material exhibits a broad pore size distribution, indicating vigorous gas evolution during melting. This phenomenon is primarily attributed to the desorption of volatile compounds physically adsorbed on the precursor powder particles.
Fig. 2. Photograph of the droplet-shaped (Y0.2Yb0.2Lu0.2Eu0.2Er0.2)3Al5O12 ceramic product (1) |
Fig. 3 presents SEM micrographs of the teardrop-shaped ceramic bead’s exterior and its fracture cross-section. The outer surface exhibits a polycrystalline morphology where individual grains display signs of coalescence across most of the area. Distinct faceting becomes apparent within surface pores; an enlarged view (Fig. 3, a) reveals well-defined euhedral crystals residing in these voids. Conversely, the dense regions of the fracture surface appear largely featureless at this magnification. However, high-magnification imaging of internal pores (Fig. 3, b, inset) confirms that the bulk volume of the ceramic possesses a developed sub-granular crystalline structure beneath the vitrified layer.
Fig. 3. SEM images of the outer surface of the droplet-shaped ceramic product (a) |
Elemental distribution maps (EDS) for all constituent cations (Al, Er, Eu, Lu, Y, Yb, O), acquired from the outer surface at high magnification (Fig. 4), indicate a homogeneous mixing of species with no observable phase separation. To verify bulk homogeneity, spot analysis was performed on the fracture cross-section. A representative spectrum of a single measurement point within the ceramic matrix (Fig. 4) reveals an elemental composition consistent with the target stoichiometry. This agreement between surface mapping and bulk probing confirms the uniform distribution of high-entropy components throughout the synthesized ceramic volume.
Fig. 4. SEM image of the surface of the synthesized droplet-shaped high-entropy |
The X-ray diffraction patterns for the initial powder mixture, the drop-shaped ceramic product, and the powder remaining in the cuvette around it are shown in Fig. 5. The results of X-ray phase analysis of these materials are as follows: the X-ray diffraction pattern of the initial powder mixture demonstrates a superposition of peaks from the oxides included in it (Y2O3 , Yb2O3 , Er2O3 , Eu2O3 , Lu2O3 , Al2O3 ); the powder located outside the drop-shaped ceramic product is a mixture of an intermediate product in the form of garnets Er3Al5O12 , Y3Al5O12 and oxides Er2O3 , Yb2O3 , Y2O3 , Eu2O3 , Lu2O3 , Al2O3 ; the drop-shaped ceramic product is a high-entropy ceramic material of the composition (Y0.2Yb0.2Lu0.2Eu0.2Er0.2)3Al5O12 (see Fig. 5).
Fig. 5. XRD patterns of the initial powder mixture (1), the intermediate product remaining |
To evaluate the mechanical properties, microhardness measurements were conducted on the fracture cross-sections of the solidified droplets. Specimens were cold-mounted in VariDur 10 acrylic resin (Buehler, Germany) and cured into cylindrical blocks. The resulting mounts were sequentially wet-ground on a Buehler Phoenix Alpha polishing system until the geometric center of the bead was exposed. Final polishing to a mirror finish was achieved using ASM 0.3/0 HOM diamond suspension. Vickers indentations (HV0.1) were applied exclusively to fully dense regions devoid of pores. An average microhardness value of 12.67 GPa was recorded. This high hardness, consistent with the single-phase XRD profile, confirms the successful consolidation of the (Y0.2Yb0.2Lu0.2Eu0.2Er0.2)3Al5O12 high-entropy garnet phase.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates a novel method for synthesizing high-entropy ceramic (Y0.2Yb0.2Lu0.2Eu0.2Er0.2)3Al5O12 , a promising candidate for thermal barrier coatings. Unlike conventional furnace sintering which requires inert atmospheres or vacuum due to equipment constraints, our approach utilizes a powerful 1.4 MeV electron beam to achieve direct volumetric melting of the initial oxides in ambient air within seconds. This liquid-phase synthesis route ensures rapid homogenization of constituent elements throughout the melt pool with minimal thermal losses to the tooling.
SEM imaging coupled with EDS mapping confirms that upon rapid quenching, the drop-shaped product predominantly consists of a uniform single-phase high-entropy garnet. Minor impurities are limited to intermediate garnet phases (Er3Al5O12 , Y3Al5O12 ) found exclusively in the peripheral unmelted residue. XRD analysis validates the phase purity of the main droplet body. The process is characterized by intense gas evolution – likely driven by desorption of atmospheric gases, residual moisture, and released oxygen – resulting in a highly porous microstructure.
The synthesized ceramics exhibit high microhardness (12.67 GPa), confirming their dense internal structure despite surface porosity. These findings suggest significant potential for scaling this technique; however, the current formation of large monolithic droplets necessitates future development of integrated jet-milling or atomization stages to produce fine HEC powders suitable for ion-plasma deposition targets.
References
1. Garvie R.C., Hannink R.H., Pascoe R.T. Ceramic steel? Nature. 1975;258:703–704.
2. Shaisundaram V.S., Balambica V., Kumar D.S., Nithish S., Chandrasekaran M., Shanmugam M., Likassa D.M. Optimization of dual coating using electroless Ni–P–Nano–TiO2 and plasma yttria-stabilized zirconia on piston crown and cylinder liner in Cl engine. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2022;4934926. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4934926
3. Xie Z.L., Li C., Zhang H.X., Yang G.J., Chen L. Durable GdTaO4/YSZ double-ceramic-layer thermal barrier coatings against ultrahigh-temperature thermal shock. Ceramics International. 2025;51(19):29781–29791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2025.04.181
4. Spitsberg I., Steibel J. Thermal and environmental barrier coatings for SiC/SiC CMCs in aircraft engine applications. International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology. 2004;1(4):291–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7402.2004.tb00181.x
5. Levi C.G. Emerging materials and processes for thermal barrier systems. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science. 2004;8(1):77–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2004.03.009
6. Schafrik R.E., Sprague R. Saga of gas turbine materials. Part I. Advanced Materials and Processes. 2004; 162:33–36.
7. Liu Z., Xiao Y., Yang L., Liu W., Yan G., Sun Y., Zhou Y. Failure prediction of thermal barrier coatings on turbine blades under calcium-magnesium-alumina-silicate corrosion and thermal shock. Acta Mechanica Sinica. 2025;41(5):424285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-024-24285-x
8. Liu T. , Qiu Y., Liu Y., Liu Z., Deng Z., Guo Z., Wang F., Liu Y. , Yu C., Wang S., Wang X. Fabrication and characterization of multilayer YSZ thermal barrier coating by detonation spraying and atmospheric plasma spraying. Ceramics International. 2025;51(20):30525–30536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2025.04.246
9. Wu J., Guo H., Gao Y., Gong S. Microstructure and thermo-physical properties of yttria stabilized zirconia coatings with CMAS deposits. Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 2011;31(10):1881–1888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.04.006
10. Alin M., Kozlovskiy A.L., Zdorovets M.V., Uglov V.V. Study of the mechanisms of the t-ZrO2 → c-ZrO2 type polymorphic transformations in ceramics as a result of irradiation with heavy Xe22+ ions. Solid State Sciences. 2022;123:106791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2021.106791
11. Li W., Huang H., Li H., Zhang W., Liu H. Facile synthesis of pure monoclinic and tetragonal zirconia nanoparticles and their phase effects on the behaviour of supported molybdena catalysts for methanol-selective oxidation. Langmuir. 2008;24(15):8358–8366. https://doi.org/10.1021/la800370r
12. Danielyan A.T., Andreev D.V. Synthesis of zirconium dioxide stabilized with yttria. Advances in Chemistry and Chemical Technology. 2019;33(4):58–59. (In Russ.).
13. Sarkar A., Wang Q., Schiele A., Chellali M.R., Bhattacharya S.S., Wang D., Brezesinski T., Hahn H., Velasco L., Breitung B. High‐entropy oxides: fundamental aspects and electrochemical properties. Advanced Materials. 2019;31(26):1806236. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201806236
14. Wei F., Zhang D., Liu Y., Xu B., Zhang X., Wang Y. Novel (Yb0.2Tm0.2Lu0.2Sc0.2Gd0.2)2Si2O7: Exploring its potential for comprehensive performance in environmental barrier coatings. Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 2024;44(4);2512–2521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.11.025
15. Wright A.J., Luo J. A step forward from high-entropy ceramics to compositionally complex ceramics: a new perspective. Journal of Materials Science. 2020;55:9812–9827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04583-w
16. Xiang H., Xing Y., Dai F.Z., Wang H., Su L., Miao L., Zhang G., Wang Y., Qi X., Yao L., Wang H., Zhao B., Li J., Zhou Y. High-entropy ceramics: Present status, challenges, and a look forward. Journal of Advanced Ceramics. 2021;10(3):385–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40145-021-0477-y
17. Ye Y.F., Wang Q., Lu J., Liu C.T., Yang Y. High-entropy alloy: challenges and prospects. Materials Today. 2016;19:349–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2015.11.0261
18. Cantor B., Chang I.T.H., Knight P., Vincent A.J.B. Microstructural development in equiatomic multicomponent alloys. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2004;375–377(1):213–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.257
19. Mukasyan A.S., Rogachev A.S. Combustion synthesis of ultra-high temperature ceramics: Review. International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology. 2025;22(6):e70044. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.70044
20. Yang L., Xie F., Guan Z., Wu L., Zhang F., Liu H., Zeng C. Ultra-multicomponent high-entropy (12RE1/12)2Zr2O7 ceramics with enhanced performance and CMAS corrosion resistance. Journal of Materials Science and Technology. 2026;258:45–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2025.08.057
21. Zhang W., Du J., Xie C., Li D., Liu R., Wang Y. Maximized cation size disorder driven phonon engineering in high-entropy pyrochlores of La2(Zr,Ce,Hf,Sn,Ti)2O7 . Acta Materialia. 2025;301:121563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2025.121563
22. Xu H., Chen L., Tian J., Li B., Zhang L., Wang J., Feng J. Diatomic site high-entropy engineering boosts thermal properties of RETaO4 for TBC applications. Modern Physics Letters B. 2025;39(32):2550184. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217984925501842
23. Hu Y., Sun G., Zhang Q., Li M., Zhu J., Shao G., Wang H., Xu H., Lu H. High-entropy perovskite ceramics with excellent broadband wave-absorbing properties by one-step sintering. Ceramics International. 2025; 51(24):42756–42768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2025.07.019
24. Wang W., Pei X., Li X., Wen W. Synthesis, microstructure, and thermophysical properties of high-entropy rare earth cerium and zirconium cerates. Ceramics International. 2025;51(14):19343–19354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2025.02.111
25. Gao C., Zhu J., Ye S., Li M., Wang H., He J. Novel high-entropy perovskite titanate: A potential thermal protective material with improved thermophysical properties. Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 2025;45(2):116878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2024.116878
26. Zheng Y., Zou M., Zhang W., Yi D., Lan J., Nan C.W., Lin Y.H. Electrical and thermal transport behaviours of high-entropy perovskite thermoelectric oxides. Journal of Advanced Ceramics. 2021;10(2):377–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40145-021-0462-5
27. Qian A., Feng B., Cui J., Zhang J., Zheng X., Gu S., Fu K., Liu J.-X., Zhang G.J., Liang Y. Highly corrosion-resistant and electrically conductive high-entropy dodecaboride ceramic composites for promising inert anode materials. Journal of Materials Science and Technology. 2026;260: 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2025.10.013
28. Volodko S., Moskovskikh D., Kochetov N., Kuskov K., Yudin S. Heterogeneous microstructures in dual-phase high-entropy carbide/boride ceramics. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2025;945:149045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2025.149045
29. Ghyngazov S.A., Vasil’ev I.P., Boltueva V.A., Vlasov V.A., Nasyrbaev A. Synthesis of high-entropy ceramics (Y0.2Yb0.2Lu0.2Eu0.2Er0.2)3Al5O12 for thermal protective coatings. Izvestiya vuzov. Fizika. 2024;67(6):24–31. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17223/00213411/67/6/4
30. Bardakhanov S.P., Trufanov D.Y., Chakin I.K., Gaponenko V.R. Gas phase large-scale synthesis of Silicon carbide nanowires by industrial electron accelerator. Materials Physics and Mechanics. 2023;51(4):96–106. https://doi.org/10.18149/MPM.5142023_9
31. Lisitsyn V., Tulegenova A., Golkovski M., Polisadova E., Lisitsyna L., Mussakhanov D., Alpyssova G. Radiation synthesis of high-temperature wide-bandgap ceramics. Micromachines. 2023;14(12):2193. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14122193
32. Karipbayev Z.T., Lisitsyn V.M., Golkovski M.G., Zhilgildinov Z.S., Popov A.I., Zhunusbekov A.M., Polisadova E., Tulegenova A., Mussakhanov D.A., Alpyssova G., Piskunov S. Electron beam-assisted synthesis of YAG:Ce ceramics. Materials. 2023;16(11):4102. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16114102
33. Ghyngazov S.A., Vasil’ev I.P., Boltueva V.A., Vlasov V.A. Synthesis of aluminum titanate based composite ceramics using high-power fast-electron beam. Russian Physics Journal. 2024;67(8):1150–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11182-024-03227-9
34. Ghyngazov S.A., Vasil’ev I.P., Boltueva V.A., Vlasov V.A. Electron beam synthesis of CaZrTi2O7 zirconolite ceramics. Russian Physics Journal. 2025;68:1454–1458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11182-025-03580-3
35. Ghyngazov S., Vasil’ev I., Boltueva V. Synthesis of complex oxide ceramics in a fast electron beam. Perspektivnye materialy. 2024;(3):78–88. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30791/1028-978X-2024-3-78-88
36. Ghyngazov S.A., Vasil’ev I.P., Boltueva V.A. Synthesis of complex oxide ceramics in a fast electron beam. Inorganic Materials: Applied Research. 2024;15(5):1490–1498. https://doi.org/10.1134/S207511332470117X
37. Ghyngazov S.A., Vasil’ev I.P., Boltueva V.A., Lyao S. Influence of modes and conditions of irradiation with a powerful of fast electron beam on the efficiency of synthesis of high-entropy oxide ceramics. In: Structure and properties of metals and alloys after energy treatment. Novokuznetsk: Polygrafist LLC, 2025. P. 69–78. (In Russ.).
38. Golkovski M.G., Denisov I.P., Ghyngazov S.A., Vasil’ev I.P., Chakin I.K. Efficiency of liquid-phase synthesis of ceramic materials under the influence of an electron beam with high penetrating power. Bulletin of the Karaganda University. Phisycs Series. 2024;116(4):35–45. https://doi.org/10.31489/2024PH4/38-45
About the Authors
S. A. Ghyngazov
National Reserch Tomsk Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey A. Gyngazov – Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor, Leading Research Scientist, Research Laboratory for Electronics, Semiconductors and Dielectrics, Research School of High-Energy Physics
30 Lenin Prosp., Tomsk 634050, Russia
I. P. Vasil’ev
National Reserch Tomsk Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ivan P. Vasil’ev – Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Research Scientist, Research Laboratory for Electronics, Semiconductors and Dielectrics, Research School of High-Energy Physics
30 Lenin Prosp., Tomsk 634050, Russia
V. A. Boltueva
National Reserch Tomsk Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valeria A. Boltueva – Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Junior Research Scientist, Research Laboratory of Electronics, Semiconductors and Dielectrics, Research School of High-Energy Physics
30 Lenin Prosp., Tomsk 634050, Russia
V. P. Krivobokov
National Reserch Tomsk Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valery P. Krivobokov – Dr. Sci. (Phys.- Math.), Professor, Head of the Weinberg Research Center, TPU; Head of the Laboratory of Radiation and Plasma Technologies
30 Lenin Prosp., Tomsk 634050, Russia
Review
For citations:
Ghyngazov S.A., Vasil’ev I.P., Boltueva V.A., Krivobokov V.P. Synthesis of high-entropy (Y0.2Yb0.2Lu0.2Eu0.2Er0.2)3Al5O12 ceramics using a fast electron beam. Powder Metallurgy аnd Functional Coatings (Izvestiya Vuzov. Poroshkovaya Metallurgiya i Funktsional'nye Pokrytiya). 2026;20(2):40-47. https://doi.org/10.17073/1997-308X-2026-2-40-47
Views:
220
JATS XML
Email this article 