Preview

Powder Metallurgy аnd Functional Coatings

Advanced search

High-temperature oxidation of ZrB2–SiC–La2O3 ceramic material produced via spark plasma sintering

https://doi.org/10.17073/1997-308X-2023-3-30-37

Contents

Scroll to:

Abstract

The study investigated the influence of La2O3 addition on the oxidation properties of composite ceramics with a composition of 80 vol. % ZrB2 and 20 vol. % SiC. The source materials utilized in this study included zirconium diboride (DPTP Vega LLC., Russia), grade 63C silicon carbide (Volzhsky Abrasive Works JSC, Russia), and lanthanum hydroxide concentrate (Solikamsk Magnesium Plant JSC, Russia), with the following elemental content (wt. %): La – 54.2, Nd – 4.3, Pr – 2.8, and trace amounts of other elements (<0.1). The La2O3 content in the charge varied between 0, 2 and 5 vol. %. The powders were mixed in a planetary mill with ethyl alcohol as the medium for 2 h, using a grinding media to powder ratio of 3:1. Consolidation of the powders was achieved through spark plasma sintering at 1700 °С, applying a pressing pressure of 30 MPa. The heating rate was 50 °С/min, and the isothermal holding time was 5 min. Oxidation was carried out in air at 1200 °С and the total oxidation time was 20 h. Oxidation experiments were conducted in air at 1200 °С, with a total oxidation time of 20 h. It was observed that the most significant weight gain occurred within the first 2–4 h of testing. Specimens containing 5 vol. % La2O3 exhibited the smallest weight gain after 20 h of exposure. Regardless of the presence of La2O3 , silicon carbide was found to be the first material to undergo oxidation. In specimens without La2O3 addition, the oxidized layer mainly consisted of silicon monoxide and dioxide. In contrast, specimens with La2O3 exhibited a predominantly oxidized layer composed of ZrSiO4 and ZrO2 . The study revealed that the introduction of La2O3 intensified the formation of zircon, which subsequently slowed down the oxidation processes in the material.

For citations:


Kulmetyeva V.B., Chuvashov V.E., Lebedeva K.N., Porozova S.E., Kachenyuk M.N. High-temperature oxidation of ZrB2–SiC–La2O3 ceramic material produced via spark plasma sintering. Powder Metallurgy аnd Functional Coatings. 2023;17(3):30-37. https://doi.org/10.17073/1997-308X-2023-3-30-37

Introduction

To date, the primary concern lies in the development of materials capable of enduring extended periods in oxidizing environments at high temperatures [1–3]. In this regard, a noteworthy focus is on ultra-high-temperature ceramics (UHTC), which consist of a ceramic matrix and a protective structure that shields the surface from oxidation [1; 4; 5]. In order to produce such materials a deliberate selection of additive phases is conducted to facilitate the formation of surface structures that can withstand prolonged exposure to oxidizing environments at high temperatures. One prevalent example of UHTCs is composite materials based on zirconium or hafnium borides, which exhibit high thermal conductivity and thermal shock resistance [6].

Sintering zirconium and hafnium boride powders requires temperatures exceeding 1950 °C due to their strong covalent bonds and low self-diffusion coefficient [7; 8]. The sintering process is typically activated by incorporating sintering additives such as SiC, Si3N4 , La2O3 , LaB6 [9; 10], tantalum, titanium, zirconium, molybdenum silicides, etc. The optimum composition is considered to be the volumetric ratio of 80 % ZrB2 to 20 % SiC [11; 12]. At high temperatures, the oxidation of these ceramics leads to the formation of a protective multi-layer coating on the surface, consisting of ZrO2–SiO2 and borosilicate glass. This coating effectively seals cracks and pores on the UHTC surface, creating a gas-tight film that prevents oxygen diffusion into the material [13; 14].

Spark plasma sintering (SPS) is a relatively recent technique that enables the reduction of sintering temperature and time for certain materials when performed under vacuum or an argon atmosphere [15]. Despite some existing studies in this area, the phase composition, structure, and oxidation properties of boride-based composite materials produced through this process have not been adequately investigated [15–17].

The objective of this study was to examine the impact of La2O3 addition on the oxidation properties of composite ceramics with the following volumetric composition: 80ZrB2–20SiC.

 

Materials and Methods of Research

The source materials utilized in this study included:

– zirconium diboride (DPTP Vega LLC., Russia);

– lanthanum hydroxide concentrate (Solikamsk Magnesium Plant JSC, Russia), with the following elemental content (wt. %): La – 54,2, Nd – 4,3, Pr – 2,8 and trace amounts of other elements (<0.1);

– grade 63C silicon carbide (Volzhsky Abrasive Works JSC, Russia).

The particle size distribution of the powders was determined using laser light diffraction with the Analysette 22 NanoTec plant (Fritsch GmbH, Germany). The ZrB2 powder exhibited a predominant particle size range of 0.5 to 12 μm, with 97 % of particles measuring less than 11.1 μm, and an average particle size of 4.52 μm. The SiC powder demonstrated a bimodal particle size distribution, with an average particle size of 3.47 μm. The La(OH)3 powder exhibited a wide particle size distribution, with an average particle size of 9.76 μm.

In order to convert lanthanum hydroxide into oxide, the material was subjected to annealing at 600 °C for a duration of 1 h in an air atmosphere. The initial powders were mixed using a SAND planetary mill in ethyl alcohol. The grinding process lasted for 2 h at a speed of 160 rpm, a grinding media to powder ratio of 3:1. The mixtures contained lanthanum oxide in two different volumetric percentages: 0, 2 and 5.

The specimens were consolidated using spark plasma sintering (SPS) on the Dr. Synter SPS-1050b equipment (SPS Syntex, Japan) at a temperature of 1700 °C. Heating was achieved by applying a pulsed direct current at a rate of 50 °C per min. The temperature was monitored using an optical pyrometer placed on the outer side of the graphite matrix. The material was loaded into the system just before the heating process began, while maintaining a constant load at a pressure of 30 MPa. The applied load was removed after the completion of the heating phase. To prevent any undesirable reactions between the sintered powder, matrix, and punches, graphite paper was employed. Additionally, graphite felt was wrapped around the mold to minimize heat losses. The specimens were subjected to an isothermal holding time of 5 min.

The apparent density and open porosity of sintered specimens were analyzed following the guidelines outlined in GOST 2409-2014.

For the oxidation study, the specimens were exposed to air in an electric furnace equipped with silicon carbide heaters. The crucibles containing the specimens were placed in the furnace, preheated to 1200 °C. After a specific duration, the specimens were removed, weighed to record their weight, and then returned to the furnace. The total duration of high-temperature oxidation was 20 h.

The phase composition of the specimens was examined using Raman spectroscopy on a multifunction spectrometer SENTERRA (Bruker, Germany), with a laser wavelength of 532 nm. The acquired data were processed using the OPUS 6.5 software.

Microscopic analysis of the specimens was conducted using an analytical auto emission scanning electron microscope VEGA3 (TESCAN, Czech Republic). In order to determine the elemental composition, an Inca X-Act detector (Oxford Instruments Analytical, Great Britain) was employed for energy-dispersive analysis of the elemental composition of the materials.

 

Results and Discussion

The investigations were conducted on the materials containing 0, 2 and 5 vol. % of La2O3 . No significant changes in the apparent density and open porosity of the specimens were observed after the SPS process. The open porosity values ranged from 3.5 to 5.5 % across all variations.

The specimens were subjected to oxidation in an air environment for a duration of 20 h. The time intervals for recording the specific weight gain of the specimens increased as the weight gain decreased. The results are presented in Figure 1. The most substantial weight gain occurred within the initial 2–4 h of testing.

 

Fig. 1. Specific weight gain of ZrB2–20 vol. % SiC ceramic specimens
with different content of La2O3 after oxidation for 20 h at 1200 °C
La2O3 , vol. %: 1 – 0, 2 – 2 and 3 – 5

 

Among the specimens, those with 5 vol. %. of La2O3 exhibited the lowest weight gain after the 20-hour exposure. It is worth noting that up to 9 h of exposure, the differences in specific weight gain were minimal. Only with further increases in oxidation time did the impact of La2O3 on the material’s oxidation resistance become more pronounced.

It has been established that the resistance of ZrB2 composite materials to high-temperature oxidation is primarily influenced by the composition of the protective layer formed on the material’s surface [18]. The fractures in the specimens were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) along with energy dispersive analysis. SEM images and maps displaying the distribution of silicon, zirconium, and boron within the specimens were obtained (Figure 2: spectrum 1 represents the surface layer of the specimen; spectrum 2 corresponds to an internal structure displaying significant visual dissimilarity; spectrum 3 pertains to a deeper layer of the material).

 

Fig. 2. SEM-images of fractures (аc) and silicon distribution maps (df) after oxidation
for 20 h of ZrB2–20 vol. % SiC specimens
Addition of La2O3 , vol. %: 0 (а, d), 2 (b, e) and 5 (c, f)
White and light gray colors on distribution maps – silicon-containing phases

 

In the specimen without the addition of La2O3 , a continuous protective layer composed of silicon-containing phases is formed on its surface (spectrum 1 in Fig. 2). When La2O3 is introduced, the silicon content on the specimen surface is also higher (spectrum 1) compared to the subsequent layers (spectra 2 and 3). However, the thickness of these layers is significantly reduced. Figure 3 presents a histogram depicting the calculated thickness of the oxidized layers, determined through analysis of the material’s microstructure (as shown in Figure 2).

 

Fig. 3. Dependence of the thickness of oxidized layers
on the surface of specimens of the ZrB2–20 vol. % SiC composition
without additives and with addition of 2 and 5 vol. % La2O3 after oxidation for 20 h
– spectrum 1, – spectrum 2 (see Fig. 2)
The third layer is not shown because it was only partially in the imaging area

 

Table 1 displays the outcomes of the energy dispersive analysis, providing the elemental composition of the specimens following a 20-hour oxidation process. The first layer exhibits identical composition across all three cases. Notably, boron is not detected in the spectra, which is consistent with the challenges in accurately capturing elements from the second period of the periodic table using spectral methods [19].

 

Table 1. Outcomes of the energy dispersive analysis of the elemental composition
of the specimens after oxidation for 20 h

 
Imaging place
(see Figure 2)
Elemental composition (wt. %) with the addition of La2O3, vol. %
025
Spectrum 1
Upper layer
O – 40.43
Si – 54.45
Zr – 2.90
O – 33.36
Si – 12.12
Zr – 54.52
O – 41.41
Si – 12.06
Zr – 46.53
Spectrum 2
Oxidized intermediate layer
O – 38.25
Si – 11.33
Zr – 47.81
O – 46.39
Si – 5.80
Zr – 36.77
B – 9.79
La – 0.55
O – 45.47
Si – 6.10
Zr – 46.96
Spectrum 3
Oxidized layer
O – 8.34
Si – 8.43
Zr – 48.42
B – 34.50
O – 24.96
Si – 3.45
Zr – 57.90
B – 13.13
O – 33.16
Si – 5.28
Zr – 53.60
B – 7.58
 

 

Table 2 presents the results of calculating the atomic composition of the layers, with values rounded to the first decimal place after considering the atomic weights of the elements (and then multiplied by 10).

 

Table 2. Ratio of elements in the layers after oxidation

 
Imaging place
(see Figure 2)
Ratio of elements and the most probable chemical composition
with the La2O3 content, vol. %
025
Spectrum 1
Upper layer
Zr0.3Si19O25
SiO2 and SiO
Zr6Si4O21
ZrSiO4 and ZrO2
Insignificant oxygen excess
Zr5Si4O26
ZrSiO4 and ZrO2
Oxygen excess
Spectrum 2
Oxidized intermediate layer
Zr5Si4O24
ZrSiO4 and ZrO2
Oxygen excess
Zr4Si2O29B9
ZrB2, ZrSiO4
Oxygen excess
Zr5Si2O28
ZrSiO4 and ZrO2
Oxygen excess
Spectrum 3
Oxidized layer
Zr5Si3O5B32
ZrB2, SiO2 or SiO
Significant boron excess
Zr6SiO16B12
ZrB2, SiO2
Oxygen excess
Zr6Si2O21B7
ZrB2, ZrSiO4
Oxygen excess
 

 

The assumed chemical composition is derived from the known composition of the initial specimens and the determined element ratios within the layers. The primary stoichiometric phases that are likely to be present are listed in Table 2. It should be noted that the formation of silicon monoxide as a crystalline compound has been previously documented in multiple instances [20–22].

The possibility of non-stoichiometric compound formation, such as borosilicate and borate glasses, should also be taken into consideration [23].

Raman spectroscopy confirmed the presence of zircon (ZrSiO4) and monoclinic zirconium dioxide (ZrO2) as the main phases of the oxidized material (Figure 4) [24]. The imaging was conducted from the surface of the specimens, thereby removing the first layer. One of the obtained spectra is presented, with the others being identical. The only distinction lies in the intensity ratio of the peaks corresponding to the main phases. The absence of silicon oxide lines in the specimen without lanthanum addition can be explained by the fact that well-oxidized phases in the second layer hinder the detection of amorphous or concealed-crystalline silicon oxide phases.

There is a noticeable disparity in the distribution of zirconium on the surface of specimens with and without La2O3 (Figure 5, ac). In the case without La2O3 , ZrO2 , despite its relatively low overall content (as seen in Table 1), is distributed relatively (Figure 5, a). Presumably, it is integrated within the primary silicon-containing phases. However, the addition of lanthanum oxide results in the growth of zirconium-bearing phase grains and the emergence of agglomerates and large pores between these phases. In this scenario, the formation of silicon oxides is unlikely.

 

Fig. 4. Fragment of the Raman spectrum of the upper oxidized layer
on the surface of a specimen with addition of 5 vol. % La2O3 after oxidation for 20 h
Designations of crystalline phases:
– zircon; – monoclinic zirconium dioxide

 

Fig. 5. Fragments of distribution maps of zirconium (аc) and boron (d)

 

Figure 5, d illustrates a fragment of the boron distribution map in the upper layer of the specimen containing 5 vol. % La2O3 , corresponding to the fragment of the zirconium distribution map in Figure 5, c. Since boron could not be detected during the determination of the mass content of elements (as indicated in Table 1), it can be inferred that boron is present in the form of silicate glasses (refer to Figure 2, f ) that fill the gaps between zircon and zirconium dioxide grains [25].

Consequently, on the surface of specimens without La2O3 additives, phases comprising silicon oxides with traces of boron and zirconium oxides are formed. In the presence of La2O3 additives, the main phases observed are zirconium dioxide and zircon, along with an excess of oxygen. However, neither case effectively acts as a significant barrier against the deep penetration of oxygen into the material. The presence of lanthanum oxide appears to enhance the formation of zircon, a phase that exhibits greater resistance to thermal shock than monoclinic zirconium dioxide and contributes to the deceleration of the oxidation process.

 

Conclusion

The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of La2O3 addition on the oxidation properties of composite ceramics with a composition of 80 vol. % ZrB2 and 20 vol. % SiC, consolidated through spark plasma sintering. The materials were examined in three variations: without La2O3 , with 2 vol. % La2O3 and 5 vol. % La2O3 . In all cases, SiC acted as a sacrificial material, being the first to undergo oxidation. Specimens without La2O3 addition exhibited a surface layer consisting mainly of SiO2 and SiO. On the other hand, specimens with La2O3 addition showcased surface layers composed primarily of ZrSiO4 and ZrO2 .

Consequently, the introduction of La2O3 intensified the formation of zircon and decelerated the oxidation processes. However, it did not serve as a complete barrier to the deep penetration of oxygen into the material.

 

References

1. Grigor’ev O.N., Frolov G.A., Evdokimenko Ju.I,. Kisel’ V.M., Panasjuk A.D., Melah L.M., Kotenko V.A., Koroteev A.V.Ultra-high temperature ceramics for aerospace technology. Aviacionno-kosmicheskaja tehnika i tehnologija. 2012;8(95):119–128. (In Russ.).

2. Naruckaja A.S., Istomin N.D. Oxidative behavior of high-temperature ceramics based on zirconium diboride. Prospects for the Development of Fundamental Sciences. In: Proceedings of the XVIII International Conference of Students, Postgraduates and Young Scientists (Tomsk, 27–30.04.2021). Vol. 2. Khimija (Eds. I.A. Kurzina, G.A. Voronova. Tomsk: Tomskii politehnicheskii universitet, 2021. P. 164–166. (In Russ.).

3. Iatsyuk I.V., Potanin A.Yu., Rupasov S.I., Levashov E.A. Kinetics and high-temperature oxidation mechanism of ceramic materials in ZrB2–SiC–MoSi2 system. Russian Journal of Non-Ferrous Metals. 2018;59(1):76–81. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1067821218010157

4. Zhitnyuk S.V. Oxygen-free ceramic materials for the space technics (review). Trudy VIAM. 2018;(8):81–88. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18577/2307-6046-2018-0-8-81-88

5. Poilov V.Z., Pryamilova E.N. Thermodynamics of oxidation of zirconium and hafnium borides. Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry. 2016;61(1):55–58. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023616010198

6. Li W., Cheng T., Li D., Fang D. Numerical simulation for thermal shock resistance of ultra high temperature cera­mics considering the effects of initial stress field. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2011;1–7:757543. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/757543

7. Rangaray L., Surecha S.J, Divakar C., Jayaram V. Low-temperature processing of ZrB2–ZrC composites by reactive hot pressing. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 2008;39(7):1496–1505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-008-9500-y

8. Gasch M.J., Ellerby D.T., Johnson S.M. Ultra high temperature ceramic composites. In: Handbook of Ceramic Composites. Boston: Springer, 2005. P. 197–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23986-3_9

9. Gozalez-Julian J., Cedillos-Barraza O., Döringet S. Enhanced oxidation resistance of ZrB2/SiC composite through in situ reaction of gadolinium oxide in patterned surface cavities. Journal of the European Ceramic So­ciety. 2014;34(16):4157–4166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.07.015

10. Paul A., Jayaseelan D.D., Venugopal S., Zapata-Sol­vas E., Binner J., Vaidhyanathan B., Heaton A., Brown P., Lee W.E. UHTC composites for hypersonic applications. American Ceramic Society Bulletin. 2012; 91(1);22–29.

11. Chamberlain A., Fahrenholtz W., Hilmas G., Ellerby D. Oxidation of ZrB2–SiC ceramics under atmospheric and reentry conditions. Refractory Applications Transactions. 2005;1(2):1–8.

12. Bellosi A., Monteverde F. Fabrication and properties of zirconium diboride-based ceramics for UHT applications. In: Proc. 4th European Workshop. «Hot Structures and Thermal Protection Systems for Space Vehicles» (Palermo, Italy 26–29 November 2002). Paris: European Space Agency, 2003. P. 65–71.

13. Justin J.F., Jankowiak A. Ultra high temperature cera­mics: densification, properties and thermal stability. AerospaceLab Journal. 2011;3:1–11.

14. Bellosi A., Guicciardi S., Medri V., Monteverde F., Scitti D., Silvestroni L. Processing and properties of ultra-refractory composites based on Zr- and Hf-borides: state of the art and perspectives. In: Boron rich solids: Sensors, ultra high temperature ceramics, thermoelectrics, armor. 2011, P. 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9818-4

15. Sonber J. K., Suri A. K. Synthesis and consolidation of zirconium diboride: review. Advanced in applied cera­mics. Structural, Functional and Bioceramics. 2011;110(6):321–334. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743676111Y.0000000008

16. Sciti D., Silvestroni L., Bellosi A. Fabrication and properties of HfB2–MoSi2 composites produced by hot pressing and spark plasma sintering. Journal of Materials Science. 2006;21(6):1460–1466. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2006.0180

17. Perevislov S.N., Nesmelov D.D., Tomkovich M.V.  SiC and Si3N4-based materials obtained by spark plasma sintering. Fizika tverdogo tela. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta imeni N.I. Lobachevskogo. 2013;2(2):107–114. (In Russ.).

18. Hurbert D.M., Jiang D., Dudina D.V., Mukherjee A.K. The synthesis and consolidation of hard materials by spark plasma sintering. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials. 2009;27(2):367–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2008.09.011

19. Hiller V.V. X-ray spectral microanalysis of boron content in the core of fiber blanks. problems of theoretical and experimental chemistry. In: Abstracts of the XXIV Russian Youth Scientific Conference Dedicated to the 170th Anniversary of the Discovery of the Chemical Element Ruthenium (Ekaterinburg, 23–25.04.2014). Yekaterinburg: Izdatel’stvo UrFU, 2014. P. 80–81. (In Russ.).

20. Gribov B.G., Zinov’ev K.V., Kalashnik O.N., Gerasimenko N.N., Smirnov D.I., Sukhanov V.N. Structure and phase composition of silicon monoxide. Semiconductors. 2012;46(13):1576–1579. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106378261213009X

21. Al Kaabi Khalid, Prasad Dasari L.V.K., Kroll P. Silicon monoxide at 1 atm and elevated pressures: Crystalline or Amorphous? Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2014;136(9):3410–3423. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja409692c

22. Gribov B.G., Zinov’ev K.V., Kalashnik O.N., Gerasimenko N.N., Smirnov D.I., Sukhanov V.N. Growth of nanocrystalline silicon from a matrix of amorphous silicon monoxide. Semiconductors. 2013;47(13):1684–1686. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063782613130071

23. Ehrt D. Structure, properties and applications of borate glasses. Glass Technology: European Journal of Glass Science and Technology. Part A. 2000;41(6):182–185.

24. Orlov R.Yu., Vigasina M.F., Uspenskaya M.E. Raman spectra of minerals (reference book). Moscow: GEOS, 2007. 142 p. (In Russ.).

25. Ban’kovskaya I.B., Kolovertnov D.V. Effect of the thermal treatment mode on the composition and structure of ZrB2–SiC system composites. Glass Physics and Che­mistry. 2013;39(5);579–588. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1087659613050027


About the Authors

V. B. Kulmetyeva
Perm National Research Polytechnic University
Russian Federation

Valentina B. Kulmetyeva – Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Associate Professor, Department of Mechanics of Composite Mate­rials and Structures

29 Komsomolsky Prosp., Perm 614000, Russia



V. E. Chuvashov
Perm National Research Polytechnic University
Russian Federation

Vyacheslav E. Chuvashov – PhD student, Department of Mechanics of Composite Materials and Structures

29 Komsomolsky Prosp., Perm 614000, Russia



K. N. Lebedeva
Perm National Research Polytechnic University
Russian Federation

Kseniya N. Lebedeva – Master’s Student, Department of Mechanics of Composite Materials and Structures

29 Komsomolsky Prosp., Perm 614000, Russia



S. E. Porozova
Perm National Research Polytechnic University
Russian Federation

Svetlana E. Porozova – Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor, Department of Mechanics of Composite Materials and Structures

29 Komsomolsky Prosp., Perm 614000, Russia



M. N. Kachenyuk
Perm National Research Polytechnic University
Russian Federation

Maksim N. Kachenyuk – Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Associate Professor, Department of Mechanics of Composite Materials and Structures

29 Komsomolsky Prosp., Perm 614000, Russia



Review

For citations:


Kulmetyeva V.B., Chuvashov V.E., Lebedeva K.N., Porozova S.E., Kachenyuk M.N. High-temperature oxidation of ZrB2–SiC–La2O3 ceramic material produced via spark plasma sintering. Powder Metallurgy аnd Functional Coatings. 2023;17(3):30-37. https://doi.org/10.17073/1997-308X-2023-3-30-37

Views: 131


ISSN 1997-308X (Print)
ISSN 2412-8767 (Online)